Author Topic: Pomak language ?  (Read 106923 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Тоска

  • Charter member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
  • % 100 + POMAK
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #90 on: May 30, 2010, 21:04 »
As i guess you're trying to estabilish a bond with iranian and aryan words. If you really want that you should look at bulgarian pronouns. Above all, bulgarian's first-person singular's (az/аз) not related with slavic grammer however it belongs to eastern iranian/aryan words so you are right. But my dialect (according to you) we use only (ya/я) for instead of (az/аз). Let me put it in that way. Why our dialect so different than referenced examples above that you share with us ? 
 
 
 

Offline Hat

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #91 on: May 30, 2010, 22:13 »
 ::) :P

Offline Hashashin

  • Defendor of the Truth
  • Forum fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 2013
  • Gender: Male
  • Has odabaşi
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #92 on: May 30, 2010, 22:14 »
As i guess you're trying to estabilish a bond with iranian and aryan words. If you really want that you should look at bulgarian pronouns. Above all, bulgarian's first-person singular's (az/аз) not related with slavic grammer however it belongs to eastern iranian/aryan words so you are right. But my dialect (according to you) we use only (ya/я) for instead of (az/аз). Let me put it in that way. Why our dialect so different than referenced examples above that you share with us ? 
 
 



AZ is protoslavic. It is used in the slavic translation of the Bible by Cyril and Methodius. Only thing in common with the iranic word is their indoeuropean roots.

Шест хиляди

  • Guest
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #93 on: May 30, 2010, 22:28 »
According to the latest and deepest language research pomak lagnuage is much more closеr to the original turkish language than bulgarian one.

Offline Тоска

  • Charter member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
  • % 100 + POMAK
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #94 on: May 30, 2010, 23:06 »
Balkandjiya, makebulgar was drew an anology about bulgarian with iranian and aryan words. Even though "az" an protoslavic word so as not! pomak language seems like different from official language again.
 

Offline Hashashin

  • Defendor of the Truth
  • Forum fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 2013
  • Gender: Male
  • Has odabaşi
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #95 on: May 30, 2010, 23:32 »
When Cyril translated bible in slavic in the 9th century he wrote:


Аз есъм Господ, Бог твой. Да не будет у тебе бози ини разве мене!


I am Lord, your God. Don't have other gods but me!


He didn't use Я but АЗ. His translation was not for Bulgaria but for Velika Moravia (present day Czech republic) It clearly shows that Slavs at this time used more АЗ than Я.  Я appeared later and was spread trough most Slavs. For example Slovenians say JAZ, in FYROM they say JAS. In most Bulgarian dialects to 19th century it was Я also but when the language was codified scholars chose the more ancient form preserved in some northern dialects- АЗ.

Offline makebulgar

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #96 on: May 31, 2010, 00:44 »
JAZ is also word in avestian (zoroastrian) language!

But   Pomak language has many basic words which have direct analogues in the   Eastern Iranian and Indo-Iranian languages. For example -

Debel, Den, Dripi, Dve, Kosa,
  • Zhaná.........

Offline Dobrev

  • Forum fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #97 on: June 01, 2010, 03:01 »



In Latin letters: Diavule! Hoa chalashtisuvaite sa da razvalim gospudyovitea praznici, da ni praznovat hristiyaneatea za Gospudya. Ahi hristiyeaninea, kakvo shtish da reachesh? Ti siga stanvash kail da sa radva dyavulat tvoya dushmanin sas tebea, pak da sa kahorva Gosput tvoyeat bubaiko i saibiya. Ia znaem kakvo shtish da reachesh: ia mlojish rabuteam i razvalem praznikat ut mlogu saklet, oti mi treava geacheanmek da si hraneam deacata, da plashtam vergii i ostaveam liturgiyata i gospudyavata didahia, treava mi da idam da naidam laf da lafovam sas noya chileak, oti shte da pode ta ni shtoa da mogam da gu zaftasam, imam saklet da mi svoarshi soya izmet ...



As we can see in this excerpt from the Damashkino, translated in 1858 from Greek for the Rhodope Christians, the language they speak is the same as the language of the Muslims in the same region.
It will be hypocritical to deny that this is one and the same Rhodope dialect, spoken by both confessional groups.

Rhodope Christians use йе and я in the same manner for indication of the personal pronoun "I".

The same pronoun я can be found all over Bulgaria - from Shopski region to the west to яз in the Eastern dialects.

The personal pronoun for the first person singular is
ja (я) instead of az (аз). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shopi


It`s interesting though that when it comes to indicating my and mine, the pronoun is the same in the entire Bulgaria мой, моя, мое, (мойо), мои. That`s what it is in the Rhodopes also. So any attempt to try to separate Rhodope as a different language non-related to Bulgarian, will fall short and will not withstand any linguistic analysis.

Rhodope dialects are Bulgarian dialects.


The other thing is the syntax - sentence construction.
No matter how many archaic words, turkish words and grammatical remnants we use in the Rhodopes, the sentences are constructed in the same manner as they are constructed in all Bulgarian dialects.

Offline Тоска

  • Charter member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
  • % 100 + POMAK
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #98 on: June 01, 2010, 11:27 »
I beg to disagree so i know all turkish dialects of west to east anatolia but none of them has not got such a marked difference as like as south east slavic language group. On the other side, as you said modern bulgarian language was created in the late of 19.th century based on a few dialects from the area of veliko tarnovo and sofia regions. This means that rhodopean dialects were excluded m i right?   ;)  As a matter of fact many of the medieval travellers when they met with ex-lands of bulgaria and macedonia laid weight on "there had exist only different slavic tongues instead of a common language"

sirrio

  • Guest
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #99 on: June 01, 2010, 15:36 »
Toska, there is just one small detail that you have missed regarding the formation of the modern Bulgarian language. The dialects from the regions of Veliko Tarnovo and Sofia were chosen for a basis of the Bulgarian language because they have been considered to be the most literary accurate. This doesn't mean that the people in the other Bulgarian regions have spoken a language different from Bulgarian. ;)

Offline Dobrev

  • Forum fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #100 on: June 01, 2010, 18:48 »
As a matter of fact many of the medieval travellers when they met with ex-lands of bulgaria and macedonia laid weight on "there had exist only different slavic tongues instead of a common language"

These differences were still in place untill the beginning if the 20th century, when the mass education was introduced and the subjects started being taught in the modern literary Bulgarian.
You will fund these different dialects not only in the Rhodopes, but everywhere in Bulgaria. The Northern dialects are different from the Southern, which differ from the Eastern, which differ from the Shop  etc, etc.

There is a very good reason for these differences.
For 500 years there was no centralized use of Bulgarian language.
There was no administrative use of it and the Church used Greek after the fall of the Bulgarian Kingdom under Ottoman rule. The low mobility of the people within the state brought to the localized development and use of the language. Every small community developed and spoke in its own vernacular.

If you come to the Rhodopes you will see that this is true even for two neighbouring villages only a few kilometers apart. The religious affiliation played no part here. People spoke the same dialect, no matter Christian or Muslim. Take for example Chepelare - it was a mixed village. Still people there spoke the same dialect. So you cannot claim that there is such a thing as "pomak" language.
I know that`s how you call it in Turkey, because the community that speaks in it consists only of pomaks.
But in Bulgaria all people, Christians and Muslims speak the same language within the given area.
And that is why we call all these vernaculars "selski govori - village dialects" as opposed to the more prevalent official language, which is generally used in big towns. We are still joking in BG that if you put two old men from Sofia and from Burgas in the same room, they will need a translator to understand each other. So this different way of speaking is valid for all Bulgaria, not only for the Rhodopes.





If you take a look at this, or for that matter if any Bulgarian looks at this, they will tell you they don`t understand it.
Yet this was the language of the land in the 11th-12th century. Since then the language has developed tremendously and today`s dialects and official language seem like light years apart from this old language. Yet if a trained linguist or philologist looks at it, they will easily show you the laws in which the dialects evolved from it.
The same happened in Greece. The old Greek was replaced with modern, because for 400-500 years of Ottoman rule, the spoken language got distanced form the old written Greek. Same happened in Bulgaria. That is why we have Old Bulgarian Language (Старобългарски език) and we have the New Bulgarian Language (Съвременен книжовен). Please do not mix the Old Bulgarian with the language of the Proto-Bulgars, as we still have no evidence how they spoke. The Old Bulgarian was the language that was developed here on the territory of the Balkan peninsula and which is a Slavic language.

Offline rado

  • Senior member
  • ****
  • Posts: 190
Ynt: Pomak language ?
« Reply #101 on: June 01, 2010, 19:12 »

Offline Sv

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #102 on: July 01, 2010, 21:33 »

As we can see the difference between them here is minor. ;)
http://slavenica.com/


I designed the Pomatski converter of Slavenica.com to reflect actual usage of Pomak I found online. I hope you find it useful: For example, Pomaks who can not Cyrillic texts can paste it in and read it. If you have any suggestions on how to improve it, please let me know.

Pomak sample text from Cyrillic:

Sırceto me boli za moyne drugari,
  moyna drujina vıv zandani leji.
  Naşeti kleti mayki çerni kırpi nosyat,
  naşeti mili bratya tıjni pesni peyat.
 
  Iskam da si ida v moyno rodno selo,
  ta da si pregırna moyne mili sestri.
  Mıka mi na sırce za bılgarska zemya,
  za bılgarska zemya, za moyna drujina.

Offline Тоска

  • Charter member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
  • % 100 + POMAK
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #103 on: July 01, 2010, 23:10 »
Slaven, Thank you for your interest. If you wanna to improve your project i'm ready to help you. As a matter of fact i had projects which are related with c# based text converter and online translator.

Offline Тоска

  • Charter member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
  • % 100 + POMAK
Re: Pomak language ?
« Reply #104 on: July 02, 2010, 23:37 »



I'm learning pomak language ;)